Why is it so difficult to build a good template for a BLENDED course? I think it's because there are a million different looks to a blended course, so the template has to be super-flexible. In the course I'm taking this semester (Designing a Blended Course), our current assignment is to design a template; so I've been giving it a lot of thought. So far, I've drafted a three-part template: Part 1--general course characteristics like objectives, topics, planned lectures, assignments, etc.; Part 2--a F2F module template with a part that helps link it to a subsequent online module; and Part 3--an online module template with a part that helps link it back to the next F2F meeting. The last two parts would be used multiple times in the mix that a professor has chosen for her course. Do you think that such a template would be useful in designing a blended course?
Let's help each other by sharing our experiences and opinions about online and blended learning.
Saturday, November 10, 2012
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Swimming in Blended Learning
This semester I feel like I am swimming (think refreshing, not drowning) in blended learning. I am taking a course (in pursuit of my instructional design master's degree at UMass Boston), and I am participating in the BlendKit2012 online course offered by UCF. Earlier this week I did an IT-sponsored workshop for faculty on thinking about what should be online and what should be F2F in a blended course. Finally, I am "blending" my core accounting course (that I am teaching to new MBA students) with 25% of the F2F classes being replaced by online activities. By the end of this semester, I hope to know a great deal more about what to do and what not to do when teaching a blended course!
What I absolutely know is this: there are many great resources to help us get better at this! A recent article from the Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks provides some "best practices" that are definitely worth reading. Here are some examples from the article:
Category
|
Best Practice
|
Design Process
|
The best strategy begins with clear course objectives. Don't shortcut here!
|
Pedagogical Strategies
|
Varied interactivity and prompt feedback are key to
student engagement.
|
Technology Utilization
|
The main tools promoted in the literature are discussions
and wikis.
|
Assessment Strategies
|
Effective practices are divided on when and where
assessments should occur, but the preference is for assessment to be
conducted online.
|
Course Implementation
Student Readiness
(addressed together in the article)
|
Communication of the blended design, expectation, and
process is key for student success. A F2F orientation is a good way to start!
|
McGee, P. & Reis,
A. (2012). Blended course design: A synthesis of best practices. Journal of
Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(4), 7-22.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
The old model is out of date...
We should be prepared for some resistance to this approach. Most of our students have experienced more of the traditional teaching model than the student-responsibility model. They may complain that "they are not getting their money's worth" if the professor doesn't take the traditional role as "the sage on the stage." As we move from face-to-face courses to blended courses, it will become more apparent to everyone--students and professors--that students must take responsibility for their own learning.
Think about the Blend 101 course you just sat through. Did you enjoy the professor-led class sessions more than any of the online weeks? The model where the students simply listen and join in a class discussion may be appealing to those of us who were educated with that model. Did you take responsibility for your own learning during the online weeks? How will we motivate our students to take this responsibility?
Friday, June 1, 2012
Lifelong Learning and Change
One of the things we want to teach our students is to become
lifelong learners. Advances in technology have now put us to the test: Can we
do what we have preached to our students? Can we show that we, too, are
lifelong learners? I’m repeatedly surprised that so many professors simply
don’t want to change what they have always done. There’s a “don’t fix what is
not broken” attitude among many professors. As long as student evaluations are
excellent and the students are passing my tests, then everything is perfect
just as it is. There is a fatal flaw in that thinking, and it’s one that we
frequently talk about in business courses.
When I was young, we had one telephone in the house, firmly
attached to the wall. It worked. It wasn’t broken. To many people who couldn’t
imagine the smart phone world that now exists, there was no need to change. (I
imagine that the parents of some teenagers wish that phones were still firmly
attached to the house.) Many successful companies have become UNsuccessful
companies precisely because they stalled in their success while the world
passed them by. As educators, we need to be careful not to become too satisfied
with our “success.” Drops in enrollments (drop in demand for our product)
DEMANDS that we keep learning, changing, and challenging ourselves to move
forward.
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Here something important (and perhaps obvious) that I've learned from taking online courses and from teaching a blended course:
It's just like a traditional course in this way: A majority of students will put in a minimum amount of effort unless the assignment/reading/discussion is graded. When one of my professors has an "optional" discussion or assignment, only a handful of students participate. We are all focused on the many assignments and readings that are graded and often don't have (or take) the time for "extra" work. With respect to this blended class, many "students" want to get whatever is easy and comfortable--like coming to the F2F sessions but don't want to put out the effort necessary to do the online part of the course. The lesson for us is that we must think very carefully about the incentives we provide for our E and P students in the new blended programs to make sure they stay involved and engaged in the course between the F2F sessions. The assignments and discussions must be meaningful and necessary for success in the course. For this blended course (Blend 101), anything that those who are taking the course can learn from the experience is a plus. For our MBA programs, engaging the students is not optional. It is critical to the success of our programs.
It's just like a traditional course in this way: A majority of students will put in a minimum amount of effort unless the assignment/reading/discussion is graded. When one of my professors has an "optional" discussion or assignment, only a handful of students participate. We are all focused on the many assignments and readings that are graded and often don't have (or take) the time for "extra" work. With respect to this blended class, many "students" want to get whatever is easy and comfortable--like coming to the F2F sessions but don't want to put out the effort necessary to do the online part of the course. The lesson for us is that we must think very carefully about the incentives we provide for our E and P students in the new blended programs to make sure they stay involved and engaged in the course between the F2F sessions. The assignments and discussions must be meaningful and necessary for success in the course. For this blended course (Blend 101), anything that those who are taking the course can learn from the experience is a plus. For our MBA programs, engaging the students is not optional. It is critical to the success of our programs.
Saturday, May 12, 2012
I spent way too much time listening to webinars on blended learning this week! The one message I that I came away with from each of them was this: INSTRUCTOR PRESENCE is crucial to a good online experience for the student. That's a combination of a good syllabus, good materials, audio and video presence (students love to see you and/or hear you), and participation in the discussion boards. In my own online experiences, I can confirm the importance of this. A good student (and that is one thing that I have always been) is on the course website everyday and loves to see that the instructor is, too. While you may not need any advice from me about teaching, please know that you can trust my advice as a student! Who else would go back to school for a master's degree at 62. Heck, I'll be 63 when I finally get it!
Saturday, May 5, 2012
It positively doesn't work to take a face-to-face class and simply slap it on the Internet -- and think you have a decent blended course. It takes an enormous amount of planning to put together a good blended course. Luckily, there are tons of resources floating around out on the web to help us. I hope that everyone who reads this blog will participate by sharing websites, experiences, ideas, and tools with all of us who are constantly striving to improve our courses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)